首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the Performance of Alternative Municipal Water Tariff Designs: Quantifying the Tradeoffs between Equity, Economic Efficiency, and Cost Recovery
【2h】

Evaluating the Performance of Alternative Municipal Water Tariff Designs: Quantifying the Tradeoffs between Equity, Economic Efficiency, and Cost Recovery

机译:评估替代市政水价设计的绩效:量化公平,经济效率和成本回收之间的权衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The design of municipal water tariffs requires balancing multiple criteria such as financial self-sufficiency for the service provider, equity among customers, and economic efficiency for society. A modeling framework is developed for analyzing how alternative municipal water tariff designs affect these three criteria. It is then applied to a hypothetical community in which a municipal water utility provides metered, piped water, and wastewater services to 5,000 households. We analyze how the shift from a uniform volumetric tariff to different increasing block tariff (IBT) designs affects households’ water use and water bills, and how these changes in turn affect measures of equity and economic efficiency for two different financial self-sufficiency targets. We calculate how changes in assumptions about (1) the correlation between household income and water use, and (2) households’ response to average or marginal prices affect the tariffs’ performance in terms of these three criteria. The results show that IBTs perform poorly in terms of targeting subsidies to low-income households regardless of the magnitude of financial subsidies that a utility receives from high-level government. When cost recovery is low, the distribution of subsidies under IBTs is even worse if the correlation between water use and household income is high. IBTs introduce price distortions that induce economic efficiency losses, but we show that these welfare losses are relatively small, especially when households respond to average prices.
机译:市政水价的设计要求平衡多个标准,例如服务提供商的财务自给自足,客户之间的公平以及社会的经济效率。开发了一个建模框架,用于分析替代性市政水价设计如何影响这三个标准。然后将其应用于假设的社区,在该社区中,市政自来水公司为5,000户家庭提供计量,自来水和废水服务。我们分析了从统一的容积式电价到不同的增量大宗电价(IBT)设计的转变如何影响家庭的用水和水费,以及这些变化又如何影响两种不同的金融自给自足目标的公平性和经济效率。我们根据以下三个标准,计算关于(1)家庭收入与用水量之间的相关性以及(2)家庭对平均价格或边际价格的反应的假设变化如何影响电价的表现。结果表明,无论公用事业从上级政府获​​得多少财政补贴,IBT在向低收入家庭提供补贴方面都表现不佳。当成本回收率低时,如果用水量和家庭收入之间的相关性很高,IBTs下的补贴分配就更糟。 IBT引入了导致经济效率损失的价格扭曲,但我们证明这些福利损失相对较小,尤其是当家庭对平均价格做出反应时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号